I recently received an incomprehensible email from someone in the department whom I did not know. The email contained only a proposed schedule for a visitor whom I had never heard of, and demanded, without preamble, that I indicate when I would be available to meet with this unknown person. I did what any rational person would do under the circumstances: I ignored it.
Several days go by, and then I receive a strangely-worded email from one of my colleagues.
To: Angry ProfessorTo which I responded:
From: Concerned Colleague
Re: Is there a problem?
Hi Angry. Melissa told me that you have refused to meet with Mysterious Guest. As chair of the search committee, is there any problem with Mysterious Guest that I should be aware of?
Best,
Concerned
To: Concerned ColleagueToday I learn that the search committee met to finalize the Mysterious Guest's schedule. The search committee was deeply concerned (a mole reports) by my "refusal" to meet with Dr. Guest. One of my colleagues explained to the committee that I had been on an NIH study section with Dr. Guest, wherein we had many bitter disagreements, and from this enmity arose my obvious reluctance to recruit him for our department.
From: Angry Professor
Re: Re: Is there a problem?
Hi Concerned. I didn't refuse, I simply didn't respond to an email from someone I didn't know demanding my time to meet with someone I didn't know for reasons I didn't know. I assumed the message had been sent to me by mistake. No problems.
Best,
Angry
Let me repeat once more: I have never heard of Dr. Guest, nor his research, which is far removed from my own area.
There is something lacking in the upper echelons of academia (in most departments, anyway), and that is drama. Graduate students have lots of drama: they fuck each other like bunnies in spring, they get drunk together and say things to each other they wish they could take back, they compete among themselves for grades and faculty recognition; it's junior high all over again for the graduate students. By the time those same students all get tenure, they have spouses and children, big, soul-sucking mortgages, and countless pressing deadlines for the completion of countless tedious tasks. Most of us have neither the time nor the inclination to waste precious psychic energy on interpersonal drama, even if it does involve hot sex with junior faculty.
Hence I am not concerned or angry that a fairly large number of people in my department are now worrying about my imbroglios with Dr. Guest and how they will influence the job search this year. I am amused, and interested to follow this patently absurd story to see how far it will go. Here's what I'm hoping for:
Dr. Guest and Dr. Professor served on an NIH study section together. They had an affair, which lasted quite a while, over several study section meetings. Dr. Guest's wife found out about the affair and became hysterical, showing up at the hotel during the last meeting. She made a scene in the lobby, which was witnessed by almost everyone on the panel, and which ended when Dr. Professor slapped her across the mouth. She then revealed that she was pregnant, whereupon Dr. Guest broke off his affair with Dr. Professor. Both Dr. Guest and Dr. Professor were asked to leave the study section, and neither have since been invited back. Dr. Professor is still furious with Dr. Guest and slanders him at every opportunity. If Dr. Guest is hired by the LSU Social Science department, Dr. Professor will make his life a living hell. And there's no way his wife will get tenure here, not if Dr. Professor has anything to say about it.

15 comments:
Dr. Professor slapped her across the mouth. She then revealed that she was pregnant, whereupon Dr. Guest broke off his affair with Dr. Professor.
Wait a minute!
Whatever happened to the Angry Bastard?!?!!?
People who claim crap like this doesn't go on are either blind or the ones who spread the nonsense in the first place. [I am referring to the actual crap, not the fictional crap you crafted.]
Wouldn't it be funny if Dr. Guest gets hired and you 2 become fast friends by accident?
Your fictional scenario story might get proliferated then...
That's brilliant. I've always asked that if people are going to spread rumours about me they should try to at least make them more interesting than my actual life so I can get some sort of vicarious joy from them.
The saddest thing is now Guest is less likely to get the job for reasons that are totally imaginary...
Also, I don't remember graduate school being nearly as fun as you make it sound ;)
Oh, Lord. Someone's desperately trying to create a shitstorm, and bless your heart for refusing to play along.
Anonymous - I wouldn't worry for Dr. Guest. I am not in his area, nor am I on the search committee. If the search committee really decides not to extend him an offer because of some story they made up themselves out of whole cloth, he's better off. Really.
Are you sure you're not in my department? Our students could readily take something like that and run with it.
Heck, last year we had one faculty member depart and the rumor was that the whole dept would be shut down.
I am so glad I do not work in an academic environment. In business this kind of gossip and fighting is limited because all the parties involved have to spend at least part of their day working to make the company go. If they do not they lose their jobs.
In academia there is no financial discipline. This means that you can fight all day long over nothing at all. If there is nothing to fight about, don't worry someone will find something, even if they have to create a lie out of whole cloth.
Your department sounds like a dismal place to work. Why don't you ditch it and get a more rewarding job?
Oh what a great story- you are so right, not enough drama so we must make some up to fill the void!
Here the major junior high drama is among the fulls. It appears that the longer you stay, the more you regress. I am very afraid of making full for this reason.
P.S. although I'd have answered the mail asking, is this meant for me? / do you need / want me?
In the departments I've worked for, the person in your position would normally have been insulted NOT to be asked to participate in the interview. So if I got an e-mail like the one you did, I would tend to think it was because the sender wanted to make sure s/he would not later be accused of having "excluded" you.
Wow, I wish grad school had been that fun for me! Maybe I ought to come to your school an get another degree... nevermind, I'm married. :P
Y'all are making me wonder if I really do want to get my master's or not. It's sounding too much like the girls school where I taught for two years out of college. Just imagine all that drama and then everyone (all 450 women, students and fac/staff) starting to cycle together. Fun times, fun times.
Girls' school, yes. But faded, it's not lack of financial discipline, it's too much of a financial straitjacket - there's not enough money to make the thing go, and a lot of what one is doing is trying to get funds appropriated so as to be able to actually work. This comes with the territory, it's not a failing of the individuals involved.
Just the the introduction before the jump makes me say: If you don't have the books by Ephraim Kishon your life is cheapened.
No person capable of writing "The email contained only a proposed schedule for a visitor whom I had never heard of, and demanded, without preamble, that I indicate when I would be available to meet with this unknown person. I did what any rational person would do under the circumstances: I ignored it." should go through life without having read his works.
Post a Comment